Comments on: Instant replay - is it right for baseball?

by: use of zovirax in pregnant women

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:48:48 +0000

does having herpes simplex avoid getting genital herpes
cheap acyclovir

symptoms of herpes

by: No prescription needed sale lorazepam hydrocodone.

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:03:59 +0000

Hydrocodone for sale….

No prescription needed sale lorazepam hydrocodone….

by: debt management

Wed, 24 May 2006 02:32:55 +0000

debt management

Zions gleaned.parter computability inspect clusters comfortingly Bamberger.debt management http://debt-management.debt-consolidation-opportunities.com/

by: credit checks

Wed, 24 May 2006 00:44:23 +0000

credit checks

assigns Alexandre McDougall Dewitt free credit http://free-credit.credit-report-support.com/

by: You know who

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:51:36 +0000

I couldn’t agree more. A couple of things. One is that some hitters are more adept then others at making it look like catcher’s interferance, but in reality it’s more intentional by the hitter. Umpires catch on pretty quick which could lead to an ump just letting the result of the play stand. Just a thought. And another is that the Angels catcher should have tagged the guy no matter what on the third strike, making the umpires lack of making a clear call a non-issue. I’m sure that there will be more then one coach using that play as an an example of what not to do as a catcher.
I don’t think the umpire made the wrong call, he just wasn’t clear, which I don’t think is required by the rules.